Wage Pressures Driving North – Fed Tied in a Box

Join our Larry McDonald on CNBC’s Trading Nation, Wednesday at 3:05pm ET

Pick up our latest report here:

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here

The US economy took on more jobs than expected in August, and wage growth touched a post-recession high.  Nonfarm payrolls grew by 201,000 in August. Economists surveyed by Reuters expected a 191,000 increase.

Fed Impact?

The question remains, with emerging markets in flames  (currency volatility at ten-year highs), what does this do the policy path of the Federal Reserve?  More rate hikes and a stronger US dollar will only add fuel to the emerging market’s fire (EM equities are 20-40% off this year’s highs, they’re in flames).  Our investment thesis is laid out in our most recent note, join us here.

US Midterm Election Impact?

Ahead of the 2016 election, wages moderated lower in key swing States, but they’ve averaged nearly 2.8% in 2018, up from 2.4% the prior 3 years. The Atlanta Fed, which tracks the same workers over time, reported a 3.3% annual gain in wage growth in July.  We MUST connect the DOTS here.  What’s the impact of rising wages on the U.S. midterm elections in November?

First Midterm Election, Seats Won+ or Lost- in the House

2010 Obama: -63*
1994 Clinton: -54*
1982 Reagan: -27
1978 Carter: -15
1990 Bush: -8
1962 Kennedy: -4
2002 Bush W: +8
1972 Nixon: +12

*Lost control of the House Wikipedia.  We can talk about Russians and family separation all day long, but we MUST weigh the impact of surging wage growth.

Wage Pressures Driving North
Average hourly earnings jumped by 2.9 percent, above the 2.7 percent increase expected.  The unemployment rate held near a generational low of 3.9 percent.  The wage growth was the highest since April 2009.

Out of the Deadzone

Long-awaited wage growth posted its biggest increase of the economic recovery in August while payroll gains beat expectations and the unemployment rate held near a generational low of 3.9 percent, according to a Bureau of Labor Statistics report Friday.

Fiscal Stimulus in the USA Ends 15 Year Down Trend in Nominal GDP, now up at +5.4% Growth
Average hourly earnings rose 2.9 percent for the month on an annualized basis, while nonfarm payrolls grew by 201,000. Economists surveyed by Reuters had been expecting earnings to rise 2.7 percent, payrolls to increase by 191,000 and the jobless level to decline one-tenth of a point to 3.8 percent.

Working with CNBC.





Summer of 2018 in Italy

Join our Larry McDonald on CNBC’s Trading Nation, Wednesday at 3:05pm ET

Pick up our latest report here:

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here

Special Thanks to ACG Analytics in Washington 

The latest clash between Rome and Brussels, which erupted over the handling of a ship transporting migrants moored in Sicily, has investors worried that given the tensions, Italy is on track to break the 3% budget deficit limit imposed by the EU when it presents its 2019 budget this fall.

Greece Style Drama Building in Italy
Italy vs. German 10-year bond yield spread is NOW through the Memorial day weekend wides, what a way to end the summer.  The VIX Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index touched 17 during the late May drama out of Italy, compared to less than 14 today.


Deputy PM Luigi Di Maio stated that Italy would withhold funding to the EU 28 bloc next year unless other member states accepted the migrants. The European Commission dismissed the threat, stating that the Union “operates on the basis of rules, not threats.” The new Italian administration uses unusually aggressive statements to move towards its policy goals, which may portend to upcoming budget talk negotiations. Investors in the Italian bond market anticipate a possible market turndown and yields across Italian government bonds show significant volatility. After recovering from an 8 basis point slump on August 28th, the Italian 10-year government bond yield sank 6 basis point in one day on August 29th.  On the other hand, the Italian government downplays the possibility of wider market selloff, stating that the country will maintain the agreed debt-to-GDP ratio on a downward path. However, the yields across the Italian government bond yield curve are higher than they were a month ago, when ECB chief Mario Draghi warned Italy that the ECB would not adjust its policy to allow for a more spending oriented Italian budget.

A Rare Refusal

European Commissioner for Budget Guenther Oettinger stated in response to the Italian administration that the move would make Italy the first member state in EU history to refuse to pay budget contributions: “This would result in late payment interests. And a breach of Treaty obligations leading to possible further heavy sanctions,”Oettinger responded. ACG Analytics foresees the Lega-M5S administration adopting a rigid line against Brussels in an attempt to bend fiscal target rules this fall.

Catalyst Dates

On September 27th, the government will present its budget update note, followed by the presentation of the budget draft on October 20th. The European Union is also expected to give its opinion on the budget draft in October. Regional elections in Trentino Alto Adige will be held on October 21st and in Basilicata in November.

Cost of Default Protection
As the cost of credit default protection exploded higher on Italian banks in late May, the Five Star Movement’s (M5S) Luigi di Maio and Lega’s Matteo Salvini reached an accord on their coalition’s program.  Likewise, the structure of a future cabinet and the candidate for the premiership were on the “Italy First” agenda.   Over Memorial Day Weekend, discussions took a sharp turn for the worse as all sides failed to agree on a new finance minister.  Some in Lega party leadership insisted on a Euroskeptic head of finance, others want a more centrist figure.  Together, the M5S and the League (Lega) have an impressive majority of 37% in the 630-seat Chamber of Deputies, though a slimmer edge in the Senate.  Their standing is up over 200% in recent years as the Populists have been able to steal political market share from center-left parties in Italy.  See our The Bear Traps Report with Larry McDonald; Tocqueville’s Italy – January 25, 2018_



Justice for All



The SEC describes stock manipulation as “intentional conduct designed to deceive investors by artificially affecting the market for a security by spreading false or misleading information about a company. Those who engage in manipulation are subject to various civil and criminal sanctions.”

Credit Leads Equity, Watch the Tesla Capital Structure Carefully
Tesla equity investors obsessed with the stock price are measuring risk-reward with just a piece of the picture.  Those you are NOT on top of the entire capital structure are sadly mistaken.  In early April, with Tesla junk bonds (5.3% due 2025) near 87 3/8 the equity was trading at $252, today the relationship is 87 3/8 vs. $319, that’s a $70 premium in the equity vs. the credit.   After just one-quarter of positive free cash flow since the fourth quarter of 2013, Tesla has $1.3B in debt maturity wall over the next 12 months.  After the ferocious burn, cash in the bank is down to $1.3 after backing out $942 million of customer deposits on cars.

Is there no better example of such stock price manipulation than Elon Musk’s recent tweetstorm?   Around mid-day on August 7, the sleep-deprived CEO of Tesla tweeted that he was considering taking Tesla private, with the compelling byline “funding secured”. Immediately following his tweet, Tesla surged higher but the company itself remained quiet. After three hours Musk sent an email to Tesla employees, clarifying his tweet. Tesla stock ended the day 31.6 dollar (+10.7%) higher, and just above $387 per share. His tweet had boosted the Tesla market cap by $5.3bl that day. The board appeared to have been completely blindsided as were Tesla’s junk-bond selling investment bankers. They confessed that they had no idea the company was working on anything like this.

Musk justification, in his email to employees, for privatizing Tesla was because “wild swings in our stock price [ ] can be a major distraction for everyone working at Tesla.“ He also blamed the shorts, which always seem to be the bane of Musk’sexistence. Musk noted that “as the most shorted stock in the history of the stock market, being public means that there are large numbers of people who have the incentive to attack the company.”

In the weekend following this tweet, and the stock still around$350 per share, Musk was allegedly on the phone non-stop, frantically soliciting investors for his privatization. This was based on the dubious claims from Azalea Banks who stayed at the Musk residence that weekend. On Sunday night Tesla released a cryptic blog statement in defense of Musk’s ill-fated “funding secured” tweet.

According to the statement, Musk had several going private talks with the Saudi wealth fund over the years. After his tweet, the Saudi manager of the fund expressed support for proceeding with a privatization subject to financial due diligence and their internal review process for obtaining approvals.” In other words, The Saudi manager had not seen Tesla’s books nor did he know if the fund’s Board would even approve funding such privatization. By then the market started to realize Musk’s initial claim was based on hope rather than an actual commitment. In the meantime, the SEC had announced an investigation into Musk’s tweet and shareholder claims started to surface as well.

But the real bombshell came on Thursday night when the NY Times published an interview with Musk that demonstrated the mercurial state of Tesla’s beleaguered Chairman/CEO. Musk claims that he typed the fateful tweet while driving to the airport and no one had seen or reviewed it before he posted it. Moreover, the article claimed that funding was anything but secured because the Saudi fund had not committed to providing any cash, according to people briefed on the discussions. The article also noted that the Tesla’s board and Musk had received SEC subpoenas, and preparing to meet with SEC officials in coming weeks.

The following day, the stock dropped 8%, erasing all the gains from the go-private speculation. Investors’ concerns were not limited to the validity of the privatization but also about the mental state of Musk. In the interview, he appeared to be breaking down several times and lamented about having to work 120 hours per week and frequently taking Ambien to be able to fall asleep.

A frantic week followed, with Tesla in full damage control. The company named the line-up of investment banks that would advise the go-private transaction. But by the end of the week, the company threw in the towel. In a dramatic U-turn, issued at 11pm on a summer Friday, Musk claimed that it behooved Tesla stay public, never mind the claims to the contrary two weeks prior.

In hind site, this entire saga appears to be a giant ruse to squeeze the Musk-reviled short sellers out of the stock. Elon Musk had gone out of his way in recent months to attack critics, going as far as trying to get a Tesla provocateur on Twitter fired by threatening his boss. In addition, Musk tweeted a meme that compared hedge fund managers to Nazi-Germany leadership and publicly mocked Greenlight’s David Einhorn, who is short the stock.

The SEC has a history of pursuing many cases of insider stock manipulation. The focus of the latest investigation into Tesla is whether Musk violated the critical anti-fraud SEC rule 10b-5. This rule specifically prohibits any scheme to defraud by misstating material information that affects the value of the stock. Among the penalties would be the SEC barring Musk to be a director or officer of a public company. A violation is not limited to prior intent, the SEC could penalize Musk based on actions that are “a significant departure of a proper standard of conduct”. To add insult to injury, with Tesla now in receipt of multiple Wells Notices (SEC enforcement letter), it’ll be increasingly difficult to raise badly needed capital. In general, companies that are under undisclosed SEC investigations do not raise capital.

We are eager to see whether the SEC succeeds in its investigation and pursues legal action against Musk. The SEC has punished many CEO’s for lesser violations but Musk thus far has demonstrated to be above the law. Numerous NTSB investigations into self-driving vehicle accidents have amounted to nothing. The SEC is already investigating Tesla about its disclosure of production issues while whistleblowers are alleging spying of employees and drug dealing on the factory floor.

We are increasingly witnessing the presence of a two tiered-justice system, where lady justice looks the other way with malfeasance by the business and political elite. The SEC has an obligation to show us that Tesla and Musk are no longer above the law and get the same treatment as the general public.


Global Credit Risk Rising

Join our Larry McDonald on CNBC’s Trading Nation, Wednesday at 3:05pm ET

Pick up our latest report here:

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here

Central Banks have Lit Emerging Markets a Fire
The emerging market foreign exchange basket just witnessed its largest 4D drawdown since Lehman.  That’s a -5.3% shift for a 5.2 standard deviation move over a ten year period.  This is an exceptionally powerful move which has NOT come to us without follow-on implications.

Blinders On

Over the last hundred years inside financial markets, we’ve found in each crisis there’s a metamorphosis, a transformation into another serpent, a far different beast.  In the 1970’s it was runaway commodity prices, a real energy crisis.  In the 1980’s, it was Savings and Loans.  The 1990’s brought us sovereign credit defaults (Russia / Long Term Capital) and the dot-com blow up.  By 2008, a full-blown sub-prime mortgage crisis was upon us.   The sad fact remains, central bankers along with regulators are often caught looking in the rearview mirror.  They’re literally oblivious to risk – we call them academics with blinders on.   Lost in the woods, this crowd has done a great job at taking leverage down inside large banks.   Yet, all they’ve really accomplished is a transfer of the leverage onto both sovereign (country) and corporate balance sheets.  Over long periods of time, when you prevent the cleansing process of the business cycle from functioning, capital oozes around the world into all the wrong places.  Bottom line, nice work central bankers (FOMC, ECB, BOJ, BOE, PBOC), you lit the fuse and now it’s about to explode.

Cost of Credit Default Protection on Turkey
Turkish Credit Default Swaps – a key instrument investors use to insure against financial turbulence – surged to their highest since the 2008 global financial crisis as the lira took another sharp dive in world currency markets. Five-year Turkish CDS jumped 78 basis points to 529 basis points, data from IHS Markit showed.

Why a Strong Dollar Matters?

1994 to 2017 Global Debt

$41T to $234T*

*$64T dollar-denominated, nearly all issued over the last 10 years.

BIS, Bloomberg

Turkey, A Large Default is Near, Contagion Upon Us

Late this week, the cost of insuring against a debt default in Turkey overtook that of Greece, which is rated four notches lower by the “brain trusts” at Moody’s.  At the same time, investors sliced exposure to emerging markets as Turkey’s currency meltdown fueled contagion concerns and a host of global hot points added to the exit from riskier assets.

A Price to Pay
There’s a “Price to Pay” for the easy money Gravy Train which has come out of central banks.  Thanks to a Reckless Fed and ECB, Turkey was able to pile up loads of debt – NOT denominated in Lira BUT Dollars and Euros, TURN OUT the Lights.   The likeness of 2018’s Turkish credit crisis and the Asian credit crisis of 1997 is very real.  If you think of Turkey’s external debt near $450B, that’s nearly 57% of GDP.  Next, add on colossal corporate debt layers (see above) – you’re in a HIGHLY unsustainable neighborhood, near 70% of GDP.  Back in 1997, Thailand’s external debt was $110B or 64% of GDP, the panic that followed rocked global markets.  Over the last month against the US dollar, Turkey’s lira -48% (since July 6th) while one month into the Asian financial crisis the Thai baht was -24% against the US dollar.  In rare company – the lira’s recent collapse exceeded daily losses during Russia’s 1998 default and Brazil’s 1999 real crisis.

India’s  Rupee, Now through Taper Tantrum Levels
In June, in a rare public tongue-lashing, the Bank of India governor pleaded for the US central bank to relax balance sheet tightening plans, they didn’t listen.

Emerging Market Dollar (Corporate Bonds) Denominated Debt Sales

2017: $495B
2016: $450B
2015: $300B
2013: $360B
2011: $220B
2009: $58B
2007: $124B

WSJ data

Credit Risk Surge – Cost of Default Protection
The Turkish Lira has plunged against the dollar to record lows this week, fueled by concern about the nation’s worsening relationship with the U.S. and authorities’ ability to anchor the nation’s assets.  With close to $250B of US Dollar and Euro denominated DEBT, every 1% move lower in the Turkish currency brings a nasty 5 billion Lira interest coverage problem, it’s good night Irene.

2018 = 1998
In nearly every substantial macro-driven risk-off period, as the crisis kicks off US equities ignore the drama.  There’s a beautiful point in every market cycle; macro takes over lazy thinking. It’s a unique, special place in which all participants have to dig deeper into what’s actually going on within the solar plexus of the global economic system. WE ARE THERE RIGHT NOW, peace.  Clients are asking if this is 1998 all over again?  We say yes.   A Lira move near seven (close to a 6 handle now) wipes out most of the equity in Turkey’s banking system, and that’s on a $1T economy.  Contagion?  EU banks are 7% – 10% lower this month!

“MSCI’s developing-nation currency measure was headed for its biggest drop in almost two months, while an index tracking equities sank the most in a week. The lira collapsed more than 11 percent on Friday and government bond yields jumped to an all-time high as traders waited to see if a speech by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan would slow the exodus. The currencies of eastern Europe were dragged lower as the euro weakened on a report that the European Central Bank was concerned about possible risks for banks.”


Turkey’s $250B of US Dollar and Euro Denominated Debt is Coming Home to Roost
Europe is facing BOTH US sanctions and tariffs on their major trading partners (China, Turkey, and Russia).  Above all, Europe’s banks are holding the bag – that’s the problem.  Here are the bag holders.  As of Q1 2018 Spanish bank exposure to Turkey 82.3bn dollars, France 38.4, UK 19.2, US 18, Germany 17.1 Italy 16.9 Japan 14. Switzerland 6.3 Canada 1.2 Austria 1.1. Portugal 0.3.  Turkey’s Lira touched a record low of 7.23/USD, the Argentina peso and Brazil’s real reached their weakest point in a month, while the Russian ruble plunged to its lowest level in two years – DEFAULT risk is RISING fast.

Turkey / Italy Bond Connection
There’s clearly a flight to quality into German bunds, more disturbing is the price action in Italy’s yields moving higher on the heels of Turkish drama.  Yields on two-year securities climbed to the highest levels in more than a week as stocks worldwide declined following a 29 percent tumble in Turkey’s lira this month.  Bloomberg noted the Italian 10-year spread over German bunds hit the highest since May.  Deputy Prime Minister Luigi Di Maio was reported as saying in an interview Monday that his country won’t be subject to an attack by speculators.

Dear Mr. Draghi, Take Notice
Foreign banks in Turkey are exposed to the local government debt for $120 billion: French and English banks are first in line, with $40.4 and $23.9 billion respectively. – BIS Data.  At the same time, momentum is building in the US Senate for additional sanctions punishing Russia for election-meddling. The run-up to the U.S. midterms in November is a critical period for U.S.-Russian economic relations.  There’s clearly a Euro impact here.  Not to mention Germany’s largest trading partner in China facing tariff risk.

Global Equities: The World’s Trading Partners are in Some Pain
Too many investors are hiding out in US equities.  Tariffs on China, US sanctions on Turkey and Russia – that’s over $15T of global GDP under substantial stress.   It would be nice if the US equity market was on an island, protected from the global economy – but that’s not the case.  Turkey’s exports to Russia soared 52.5% last year, up to nearly 6% of GDP.  As a result, US sanctions on Russia just add to the Turkish economic dilemma, it brings DOUBLE trouble default risk.  US Russia sanctions + Turkey Sanctions = Rising Credit Risk.

Where’s the trade?  Pick up our latest report here.



The Dark Side of FAANGs, Crash Warning at DEFCON One

Join our Larry McDonald on CNBC’s Trading Nation, Wednesday at 3:05pm ET

Pick up our latest report here:

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here

This blog was published on July 20th, on July 26th Facebook plunged 22% on record volume, $120B was wiped out in one day – the largest single stock incident of wealth destruction on record.

Market breadth — “a method used in technical analysis tries to determine the direction of the market. Positive market breadth occurs when more stocks are advancing than are declining and suggests that the bulls are in control of the market’s momentum. Conversely, a disproportional number of declining securities is used to confirm bearish momentum.”


“If I could avoid a single stock, it would be the hottest stock in the hottest sector”

Peter Lynch, Portfolio Manager of the Fidelity Magellan Fund 1977-1990

The Fab Five: FAANGs Equities (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google)

One of the golden rules of market analysis is found in true underlying breadth.  Looking at U.S. equities today, there’s burning question; how many stocks have really been invited to this party? Every day we hear about markets hitting new highs, despite the fact that the S&P has been wrapped around 2800 since January.   Above all, beneath the surface, there’s something far more disturbing.  Our Index of 21 Lehman Systemic Risk Indicators has risen to its HIGHEST level since the summer of 2015.

Enjoy our segment on CNBC with an analysis of the FAANGs.

S&P 500 Index Price

July 20: 2800
June 13: 2800
Mar 13: 2800
Jan 16: 2800

Bloomberg terminal data

The Fatal Passive Overdose, BEWARE!

Since 1993, capital shifting into passive asset management is up 161x, this compares to only 7x for active management.  Nearly $7T is now positioned in passive asset management, over $2T of this money has arrived in the last five years.  Why does this matter?  Passive asset management is simple ownership of the market through index funds, the capital MUST be fully invested and has been the fuel behind the toxic run-up in FAANG equities.  Let us explain.

One Large Beast

Looking at the passive asset management orgy, there’s no better example than the Fidelity Magellan Fund.  Famously known as the largest mutual fund on earth in the 90s, what became of this beast is nothing short of remarkable.   With assets north of $100B back in the year 2000, today he sits as just a shell of his former at $17B.  The most shocking part of this story is found in the explosive asset formation in Fidelity’s S&P 500 (Passive) Index Fund.  Assets in this giant have climbed to more than $153B, with $21B forced into  FAANG equity ownership.  As a market-weighted, passive index fund there is no choice or selection process, this beast MUST own these FAANGs – a colossal failure of common sense indeed.  It’s NOT Fidelity’s fault, they’re just offering another index fund the mad mob wants to invest in.  This is just another example of a classic, late-cycle development often found in tired bull markets – the hot money chase indeed.  As more and more capital flows into passive index funds, more and more FAANG shares MUST be owned.  Returns appear far better than the rest of the market’s offerings, so even more capital flows in – it’s a toxic, self-fulfilling cycle – when broken the declines will be HISTORIC.

Largest Weekly Fund Capital flows into Technology Equities All-Time

Jan 2018: $2.4B
May 2018: $2.2B
Dec 2017: $1.9B
Nov 2017: $1.2B
Nov 2016: $1.0B
Jan 2012: $900m

EPFR data

While FAANGs Boom, the Rest of the Market is Left BehindIn early June, the number of NYSE stocks at their 52-week highs started to move sharply lower, breaking the trend (see above) with the price of the FAANGs equities (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google).  Since January, while Netflix and Amazon have gone up 67% and 38% respectively, while the number of NYSE stocks at their 52-week highs has declined from 341 to 177 in June – to now just 71!  Bottom line, the divergence between the few (just 5 stocks) FAANG equities, and all the rest of the market presents a crystal clear example of negative breadth. This growing disparity in the markets extends to real economic terms as well.

Profits in the Hands of the Few

According to an analysis conducted by the Wall St. Journal, in 1978 the percentage of profits coming from America’s 100 largest companies was near 46%, today we’re approaching 85%!  The inequality decade has some very ugly side effects, doesn’t she?  The clock is ticking here, G10 countries have VERY large aging populations.  Indeed there are some bills to pay.  In the U.S., Medicare will run out of money far sooner than most expected, and Social Security’s financial problems can’t be ignored either.  This month, the U.S. government said in a sobering checkup on programs vital to the middle class – Medicare’s available cash is dwindling at an alarming rate.   Per the LA Times, the report from the program trustees says Medicare will become insolvent in 2026 — three years earlier than previously forecast. Its giant trust fund for inpatient care won’t be able to fully cover projected medical bills starting at that point.  As populism continues to march forward, we expect the FAANGs to have a VERY large target on their back in the months and years to come.  Somebody has to pay for these mathematically unsustainable promises made by politicians, and we’re looking at you FAANGs.

Is that Your Fair Share Amazon?

Even with the dire straights of U.S. unfunded liabilities (Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security), only 12.9% of Amazon’s profits went to federal, state, local and foreign taxes from 2007 through 2015, per S&P Global Market Intelligence.  In ugly fashion, that’s half the average amount S&P 500 companies paid over the same period.  Look for populism’s surge to take a large bite out of Amazon in the near future.

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here

Jumping into Bed with a Greater Fool

At the very end of the day, an investment in FAANG equities today involves jumping into bed with the greater fool theory.   Sure, there’s always late cycle dumb money pushing prices higher, but 2018’s toxic ingredients have come together and forged an atrocious risk-reward in these overstuffed equities.

Wall St.’s Research, a Lesson in Crowded Trades

General George S. Patton once said, “if everyone is thinking alike, then SOMEONE isn’t thinking.”  Wall St.’s “brain trusts” have 182 buys on FAANG equities and just 7 sells, this gives a colossal failure of common sense new meaning.  Highly reminiscent of the late 1990s indeed.

Wall St.’s Change in 12 Month Price Target in 2018*

January vs. Today

Facebook $FB: $210 v $228
Amazon $AMZN: $1305 v $1930
Apple $AAPL: $189 v $199
Netflix $NFLX: $212 v $371
Goole $GOOGL: $1180 v $1270

*Consensus of over 35 analysts, Bloomberg data.  One of the biggest problems with Wall St. equity research is found in their favorite past time, performance chasing.  In terms of job security, they believe there is safety in numbers.  As a result, the sheep move in lockstep together.  Analysts tend to move up their price targets as the bull market picks up steam.  At the end of the day, often times the little guy is left holding the bag as price targets rise, and rise again.  More and more of the crowd gets sucked in at higher prices.  There’s little focus on risk-reward at nosebleed price levels.

Wall St., A Love Affair with the Few

“The market cap of the five biggest stocks in the S&P 500 is now almost exactly equal to the market cap of the smallest 282 S&P 500 companies. Both come to just under $5.1tn. Today’s chart of the day shows that a six-member FAANMG sector (FAANGs + Microsoft) would at this point be comfortably bigger than any of the 11 economic sectors into which the S&P is divided.”

-Financial Times

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here

FAANGs Crushing the Rest of the S&P 500

This speaks to fleeting market leadership and above all, a very unattractive risk/reward facing investors today. We’re talking about an indicator of market health here and for right now, even with all the glorious headlines, we’re looking at a sick patient.

In our view, the FAANG stocks are massively overvalued and thus ripe for a massive roll-over.  before year-end in our view.  Even a relatively minor downturn in the market as a whole could wreak havoc on the FAANGs.  And as stated earlier, the disproportionally high number of equities declining in price is hidden by the FAANGs.  What’s worse is that such a rollover would have massive implications for some of the market’s largest asset management firms.

Inflows of into Passive Management Funds and ETFs (Exchange-traded-funds)

There are 605 ETFs which hold FAANG equities as a top 15% position in the fund!!!!  This has to be the most crowded trade in the history of financial markets – just five stocks make up most of the ETF universe, lookout!

ETF Ownership of FAANG Equities

2018: 605
2017: 501
2016: 430
2015: 332
2014: 277
2013; 230
2012: 175
2011: 101
2010: 62
2009: 14
2008: 9

Just five stocks as a top 15 holding in 605 ETFs, think about that… ETFDB data

 In January Alone – Passive Asset Management Inflows
2018: $105B
2017: $68B
2016: $18B
2015: $22B
Each month as capital flows in, FAANGs must be purchased.
Dislocated from Reality

Around 20 years ago, nearly all of asset management was active. Fund managers would buy and sell equities using personal judgment and research.  In the last five years, trillions have flown into passive management, where managers place funds into market-cap-weighted ETFs and indices in an attempt to capture the momentum of the market, without doing research. While equally-weighted indices own all stock equally, market cap weighted-funds are more heavily weighted to larger-cap stocks (S&P (passive) Index Funds, for instance, are heavily weighted to FAANG stocks.  A closer look shows; 3.8% Apple, 3.1% Amazon, 3.1% Google A 3%, Google C 3%, 2% Facebook and nearly 1% Netflix.  That’s 16% of the index in just five stocks). Thus, the rise in passive management has made FAANG stocks more dislocated from reality, as passively-managed funds are disproportionately forced to own them. Thus, the explosion of capital into passive funds has been forcing more and more capital into fewer and fewer stocks.  This will end in tears – SELL Mortimer SELL!

Facebook’s Largest Holders
Vanguard 170m shares
BlackRock 147m shares
Fidelity 122m shares


UK Political Risk: Points to a May Summer Exit

Join our Larry McDonald on CNBC’s Trading Nation, Wednesday at 3:05pm ET

Pick up our latest report here:

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here

Resignations in May’s Cabinet will Topple Government in Our View

This weekend was punctuated by news of major resignations from within British Prime Minister Theresa May’s cabinet by Secretary of State David Davis and Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson. These came in response to Friday’s controversial “Chequers Agreement,” which many pro-Brexit figures saw as a betrayal and an arrangement that kept the UK far too close to the EU and its regulatory power.

Bearish Bets on the Pound Mounting
Net shorts are piling in, bets against Sterling on the rise.

Elections in the Offing?

This strong rebuke from two high-profile members of the “Leave” camp demonstrates in the strongest possible manner a continued dissatisfaction amongst more hard-line Conservative MP’s on the Prime Minister’s handling of Brexit. We believe this also foreshadows a “no confidence” vote within the next three months, the removal of Theresa May from office, and potentially a new round of General Elections.

Theresa May Exit Date Odds:
Betfair: 1/1 (by Sep. 2018)
SkyBet: 10/11 (by end 2018)
Ladbrokes: 4/6 (by end 2018)
Coral: 4/6 (by end 2018)
$markets: 5/6 (by end 2018)

“The betting on her exit date has moved very sharply from a 26% chance on Betfair [Sunday] morning that she’d be out this year to a 55% chance now [on Monday].” -politicalbetting.com

UK General Election in 2018 Odds:
Betfair: 6/4
SkyBet: 13/8
Ladbrokes: 7/4
Coral: 7/4
$markets: 23/10

Pound Breaks its Recent Trend
We take a negative view on the GBP and UK Equity for the next six months. The Pound (GBP) has taken a significant hit recently on the back of uncertainty regarding the status of negotiations on the EU-UK post-Brexit agreement. The increased risk of a domestic government meltdown and a May exit will only serve to further compound this bearish trend.

No Confidence

A “no confidence” vote in the House of Commons from May’s own Conservative MP’s will have a substantial market impact, as it would hint toward a “harder,” more pro-Brexit successor. Such a person would almost certainly be more opposed to the UK remaining in the EU common market, causing even greater upset to the UK market due to greater trade worries.

If the Conservative Party (Tories) is unable to agree on a pick for Prime Minister following a successful “no confidence” vote, general elections will follow. We determine that the risk of a Labour victory will weigh on UK Equities and the Pound in such a scenario, as a government under big-government, high-tax Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn would prove unfavorable for markets. Such a scenario could also imperil the current state of affairs when it comes to Brexit negotiations, with substantial market impact.

Pick up our latest report here:

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here


Populism’s Rage, Once Again has EU Banks in Pain

Join our Larry McDonald on CNBC’s Trading Nation, Wednesday at 3:05pm ET

Pick up our latest report here:

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here

Special thanks to ACG Analytics

Blog updated May 29, 2018 at 7:44am ET


Italy’s UniCredit Bank Equity
Italian banks led European financial stocks lower as the growing likelihood of new elections shook investor confidence. Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, the habitually-volatile state-rescued bank, led declines with a drop of as much as 7.8 percent. The eight worst performers on the Bloomberg Europe Banks Index were all Italian lenders as of 12:07 p.m., with UniCredit SpA losing almost 4 percent and Intesa Sanpaolo SpAdown about 3 percent. At least a part of the pressure on equities came from the bond market. The yield on Italy’s benchmark 10-year sovereign bonds surged again on Monday to over 2.60 percent, it highest in nearly four years. – Bloomberg


Breaking: Italy Sells $5.7B of 183-Day Bills, Yield 1.213% 

Previous T-Bill Sales Below

May: +1.21%
April: -0.42%
March: -0.43%
Feb: -0.40%

– This is an incredible surge in the cost of short-term financing as of Tuesday Morning May 29, 2018.

Two Year Bond Plunge – Yield Surge in Italy
Italy 2 Year Bond Yields now through the US for the first time since November 2014.  

10 Year Bond Yields and Recent Change

US: 2.80% (-30bps)
Australia: 2.68% (-24bps)
Italy: 3.16% (+143bps)**
Canada: 2.30% (-23bps)
UK: 1.22% (-34bpss)
Spain: 1.64% (+47bps) **
France: 0.68% (-32bps)
Germany: 0.29% (-47bps)

Bloomberg data

Rough Weekend

As the cost of credit default protection is surging on Italian banks, the Five Star Movement’s (M5S) Luigi di Maio and Lega’s Matteo Salvini managed to reach an accord on their coalition’s program.  Likewise, the structure of a future cabinet and the candidate for the premiership are on the “Italy First” agenda. All that is left for the two is to seek out the mandate to rule from President Sergio Mattarella Over the weekend, discussions have taken a sharp turn for the worse as all sides failed to agree on a new finance minister.  Some in Lega party leadership insist on a Euroskeptic head of finance, others want a more centrist figure.  Together, the M5S and the League (Lega) have an impressive majority of 37% in the 630-seat Chamber of Deputies, though a slimmer edge in the Senate.  Their standing is up over 200% in recent years as the Populists have been able to steal political market share from center-left parties in Italy.  See our The Bear Traps Report with Larry McDonald; Tocqueville’s Italy – January 25, 2018_

Populists Surging in the Polls, Can You Wonder Why???
As you can see above, Italy’s raw deal on the Euro is an open wound – it can’t be swept under the rug for much longer.  It’s an #ItalyFirst moment indeed. 
A recent poll for the daily La Repubblica put support for the Trump-like Populist League (or Lega) at close to 22 percent, up from 17 percent in March, which would make it Italy’s second most popular party. Support for the League’s (Lega) largest rival,  5Star, stayed steady at 33 percent, while support for the incumbent center-left Democratic Party dropped from 19 percent to 18 percent.  Bottom line, populists now control 55% of the vote – Euroskeptic sentiment is on the rise.

“Italy First. Either this government gets started in the next few hours and we start working, or we might as well go and vote again and get an absolute majority.  Although it would be disrespectful to Italians if this government doesn’t get started because it’s unpleasant to someone in Berlin or Brussels.”

Lega Leader Salvini told a rally near Bergamo in northern Italy late on Saturday (Bloomberg reported).

” President, Sergio Mattarella said he could not countenance their  (Lega / Five Star) selection of an economics minister who he said threatened to take Italy out of the eurozone. He said even the threat of leaving the euro would have dramatic consequences on the markets, costing Italian families and investors money and its young people opportunities.” –

New York Times, reported Sunday evening, May 27, 2018

A Trump 2.0 in Italy

We believe the Salvini’s (Lega) surge in popularity is on par with Trump’s rise in 2016.  If the Lega star was a stock, you would want to be long of it.   Sunday evening, the leaders of the Five Star Movement were already discussing Mr. Mattarella’s impeachment, while Matteo Salvini, the leader of the League, who would not budge on his choice for a eurosceptic economics minister, and who has seen his popularity rise during the tortuous negotiations, is eager to go to early (new) elections. 

Near-Term Debt Coming Due, a High Mountain
Populists in Italy (Lega – 5Star) calling for the quick deportation of an estimated 500,000 immigrants (Sky News) from Italy, with $2.4T of debts and $2.0T of economic output, they question the financial sustainability of EU migration policy?  The cost of default protection on  Italy’s bonds is climbing the most since dark days of the European debt crisis.  Political uncertainty has unearthed risks inside the financial system of the southern European nation. The five-year Italian credit default swap rose about 42 basis points last week, the most since 2012, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Populist leaders abandoned their attempt to form a government at the weekend after the president rejected their choice of a euro-skeptic finance minister, while Moody’s placed the country’s ratings on review Friday for a possible downgrade. 

“Italy has over $800B of debt maturities coming due between now at 2022, that’s nearly 40% of their total $2.4T debt load – some bills have to be paid here indeed.” – The Bear Traps Report, January 2018

Bonds for Sale – Italy Needs Friendly Capital Markets

Highly in need of friendly (wide open) capital markets, Italy needs easy access to financing.  If the beast inside the market continues to turn on Italy, this will place Mario Draghi’s ECB in a very difficult spot.  Italy still needs to sell bonds worth $130B in the markets this year, according to BofAML.  This figure will ONLY increase if populists get their way on an aggressive fiscal spending plan with tax cuts.  We MUST remember, there are rules within the ECB’s “capital key.”  The central bank cannot purchase large amounts of Italian debt relative to other EU countries.  These capital key limits will be stretched to high-stress levels in the coming months.  Draghi will need a sign off from Germany on additional capital key expansion for Italy. ” Angela, please get out the checkbook.”  The rise of “Germany First” populists in Deutschland presents political stress on the other side.  The AfD party has surged from 1% to 18% since 2013.  Populists in German (Afd) and Italy (Lega) both have their hands on a very large rubber band and they’re walking backward at an accelerated rate. 

Weekend Drama, Selection of New Finance Minister a Focus

According to Article 92 of Italian Constitution, it is the president who appoints ministers “following PM’s proposals,” (Lega wants Savona in a large way).

“Italy’s novice premier-designate Giuseppe Conte struggled to form a populist government throughout the weekend, stranded between a president who objects to a eurosceptic candidate for the economy ministry and a coalition ally threatening to force early elections.  Conte, 53, is working on a list of ministers to propose to Sergio Mattarella, 76, the head of state whose task it is to name the government team. The talks are likely later Sunday (May 27), according to an official of the anti-establishment Five Star Movement who asked not to be identified because the plans weren’t public. Economist Paolo Savona*, 81, a candidate for the economy ministry, said in a statement on an Italian website on Sunday that he was in favor of a European political union and urged full implementation of objectives in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.  Efforts to form a populist government could be jeopardized by a tussle over Savona between the president and Matteo Salvini of the anti-immigrant League, which is Five Star’s junior partner, and lead to early elections possibly in the fall. The populists’ pledges of fiscal expansion and tax cuts would defy European Union budget rules, and the Italy-Germany 10-year yield spread reached the widest since 2014 on Friday.”  – Bloomberg

* Savona, a company executive and former industry minister, has come under fire both for repeatedly calling on the government to plan for a possible euro exit and for his criticism of what he sees as German dominance of Europe. Mattarella, a former constitutional court judge, insists on his right to appoint government ministers, without pressure from outsiders. In our view, we’re looking at a Savona moment.  If the new Italian government agrees with populists (Lega – 5Star) and chooses him as finance minister, it substantially raises the probability of a destructive EU conflict with Italy.  It would be gasoline on the “risk-off” fire.  If EU pressure prevents the populist agenda from moving forward, it will lead to a large surge in the polls for Lega – 5Star in the next round of elections (coming this year).  That’s bad news for markets as political pressure on the ECB is surging to it’s highest level in years.

Eurozone Debt Load

Italy: $2.2T
Spain: $1.0T
Germany: $860B
Ireland: $156B
Portugal: $150B
Greece: $60B

Bloomberg data

So, Draghi (ECB) expands the capital key / bond buying mechanism for Italy? And the others??

A Tale of Two Banks
Politics is driving asset prices here.  After months of House delay in sending a Dodd-Frank regulatory relief bill to the President’s desk, President Trump signed the legislation this week. As you can see above, KRE Regional Bank ETF has been pricing in the good news for months. The bill is identical to the version which passed the Senate in March and provides relief aimed at community banks, while raising the systemically-important financial institution (SIFI) threshold from $50 billion to $250 billion (although the Federal Reserve may still subject banks between $100-250 billion for enhanced supervision). Among other provisions, mortgages held by banks with under $10 billion in assets are automatically designated as “Qualified Mortgages,” and community banks which underwrite fewer than 500 mortgages a year will be largely exempt from Dodd-Frank mortgage rules. The amended law also provides regulatory relief for appraisal requirements in rural areas, as well as broader relief to community banks in having to furnish Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data and lengthens the examination cycle for well-capitalized banks from 1 year to 18 months. – ACG Analytics.

Pick up our latest report here:

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here

A Placeholder President

Mr. Di Maio and Mr. Salvini presented the coalition’s Prime Minister (PM) pick to the President this week. The candidate, Giuseppe Conte, a law professor, is without governing experience. By selecting a political novice for the premiership, Di Maio and Salvini improved their chances of exerting influence on the likely future PM.

Deficit Spending and Tax Cuts

The coalition program plans to bolster the country’s spending by killing pension reform, introducing a flat tax, and by increasing expenditure on maritime migrant interception programs. While the major points of controversy were scrapped from the final proposal (the final version does not mention leaving the eurozone, or a plan to get bonds purchased as part of the ECB’s QE program), potentially fiscally worrisome measures remain.

Cost of Credit Default Protection, on the Rise
Clearly, the new governmental program will lead to a clash with Brussels.  The cost of credit default protection is surging in banks with heavy exposure to Italy.  We haven’t seen this kind of credit risk divergence between EuroZone and US banks in six years.  Our Index of 21 Lehman Systemic Risk Indicators is rising at the fastest pace since 2012.  See our full report on The Bear Traps Report with Larry McDonald; Tocqueville’s Italy – January 25, 2018_

Cost of Credit Default Protection (Updated April 29, 2018)

Deutsche Bank: 306 (+101)
Intesa Sanpaolo: 397 (+225)
UniCredit: 396 (+230)
CommerzBank: 224 (+80)
Santander: 244 (+140)
Soc Gen: 180 (+87)
BNP: 178 (+88)
UBS: 102 (+28)

*(change since April), sub CDS, in basis points, Bloomberg data

Keeping Financial Commitments

The agenda is likely to divert Italy from abiding by EU fiscal regulation (i.e. the Fiscal Compact). France has already issued a preemptive warning with French Economy Minister Bruno Le Maire stating: “The stability of the eurozone will be at stake if a populist new government in Italy fails to keep its financial commitments.”

Italy’s 50 Year Bond Price Plunge
Italy’s 50 Year Bond plunged 12 points last week. In October 2016, ‘Italy’s $5.6 Billion Sale of 50-Year Bonds Beats Peers’.  Italy sold five billion euros ($5.6 billion) of the securities, exceeding deals by Spain and France for similar-maturity bonds. The country became the latest in Europe to issue super-long bonds, following debt agencies in Belgium, France, Ireland and Spain taking advantage of historically low-interest rates made possible by the European Central Bank’s 1.7 trillion-euro stimulus program. The ECB, whose asset purchases were expected to run to at least March 2018 (now at least March 2019), has acquired more than 900 billion euros of debt just from the Italian, Spanish and French governments. Political risk continues to fuel market volatility and uncertainty in the sovereign bond market, especially with regard to, short-term security issuance aimed at covering the state suppliers and tax rebates–which, if implemented, could cost the Italian taxpayers more than 5% of the Italian GDP.

Stocks in Italy, 10% off their April Highs
Equities in Italy are approaching key technical levels.

Italy’s Baa2 Rating May Be Cut by Moody’s
Moody’s says the key drivers for the placement are the significant risk of a material weakening in Italy’s fiscal strength and the chance that the structural reform effort stalls. Italy’s long-term and short-term foreign-currency bond and deposit ceilings remain unchanged at Aa2 and P-1, respectively.  “What’s the point of going to vote if it’s the ratings agencies that decide?” Luigi Di Maio, head of Five Star said Sunday in frustration.  He believed financial stress in markets played a roll in the veto of their proposed Finance Minister Paolo Savona.

No Strings Attached

The coalition agreement is not a legally binding treaty—the two populist heavyweights could resort to resuscitating the more radical among the scrapped measures in the future.  Even though the coalition partners left out of their final program some more drastic measures, there was an original proposal which contained a draft to explore ways of leaving the euro (as well as recommended ECB debt jubilee, or forgiveness).  Calling for the new government to stick to a responsible budgetary policy, the vice-president of the European Commission, Valdis Dombrovskis, noted that Italy’s borrowing was proportionally the highest of any euro-zone state except Greece.

Regime Change: Eurozone Equity Market Vol Crosses the U.S.
For the first time in a year, we’re seeing the cost of equity volatility protection in Europe surge through that of the U.S.  This is impressive since this year’s (White House trade and Fed interest rate) drama in equity markets has been U.S. centric. This speaks to a regime change in risk management to a more Europe leading focus moving forward. In the 2010-12 period, for months European credit risk moved well ahead of U.S. equity volatility.  A solid leading risk indicator indeed.

Pick up our latest report here:

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here

A Back Away from High Drama, for Now?

The program has already inflicted High Drama on EU member states, especially within the eurozone. While M5S and Lega claim that the mini-BoTs proposal is not a veiled attempt at introducing a shadow parallel currency, many seem to doubt the honesty of their intentions.  We witnessed this dangerous political gamesmanship during the early stages of the Greece crisis in 2010.  When tensions are high, populist politicians in some cases leak sensitive parts of their agenda.  Almost as a trial balloon, they are testing both the markets and EU political leadership’s reaction process.  EXPECT A LOT MORE OF THIS TO COME.

The Di Maio-Salvini-Mattarella meeting will provide clarity on the new M5S-Lega administration, and reveal details on the coalition’s future program. It is not certain that the new government will actually move to implement all of the policies enumerated in the contract. With a small majority in parliament, it will be very difficult for the future government to pass radical legislation. Furthermore, President Mattarella retains the right to veto proposals.

Euro, Broke the Uptrend Line going back to 2014
Deutsche Bank bailout rumors, falling PMIs (economic data), Populism in Italy and government stability problems in Spain have all taken the Euro down to 1.16 from 1.25.  Spain’s opposition socialist party has filed a no-confidence motion against the prime minister, Mariano Rajoy, a day after his governing People’s party was found to have benefited from an illegal kickbacks-for-contracts scheme.

Full Term?

The new cabinet could be sworn in before the end of this week. The process would be finalized by a vote of confidence in both the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies. ACG Analytics does not believe that a M5S-Lega government can survive for a full term—the arrangement is likely to have a limited shelf-life, as the notable policy differences between the two parties and inevitable backstage influence of Berlusconi’s Forward Italy party on Lega is certain to exacerbate the tension between them.

Pick up our latest report here:

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here

Prime Minister nominee Conte served on the Board of Directors of the Italian Space Agency as a legal consultant to the Rome Chamber of Commerce, and as a supervisory board member to a number of insurance companies going through bankruptcy.

Two Year Bond Yields, Screaming Higher in Italy – 2012-2018
Italy two year bonds, moving from -0.32% in early May to +0.48% this week.  We witnessed the largest yield spread differential between Italy and Spain in over 5 years.  Systemic risk is on the rise.

Further details of the coalition agreement cover:

“Parallel currency”: The new government plans to launch mini-BoTs, controversial securities similar to a parallel currency, as part of the administration’s plan to ramp up expenditure. These short-term securities would be used to pay overdue tax rebates and state suppliers.

Flat tax and universal income: The Lega made its flat tax policy for companies and individuals a part of the contract, with two tax brackets at 15% and 20%. The M5S inserted its basic income plan into the program, proposing a EUR 780 monthly compensation paid to those with no revenue.

EU policy: A number of measures introduced calling for the renegotiation of EU treaties and the EU’s economic regulation on several issues, including the single currency. Both parties pledged to tackle smuggling networks and illegal migration, calling for a new debate in Brussels on European migration. Furthermore, the program calls the immediate withdrawal of sanctions against the Russian Federation.

Pension reform: The program envisions the gradual scaling back of the “Fornero” pension reform.

Sovereigntist economy policy: The program aims to implement a legal minimum wage (not yet specified), ramp up savings protection, increase the responsibility of banking authorities, prevent the sale of Alitalia, and re-negotiate the Turin-Lyon high-speed railway project.

Pick up our latest report here:

Don’t miss our next trade idea. Get on the Bear Traps Report Today, click here


Investment Newsletter

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons